Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Kyle Kang vs Jacob Brumm Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kang vs Brumm analysis and find out who is favored!
Kyle Kang vs Jacob Brumm Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kang 2 - 0 Brumm
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kang has won 47.8% of points on their second serve, while Brumm has won 47.54%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kang, in recent form, has won 51.6% of their opponent's second serve points, while Brumm has won 52.28%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.83% and 31.56% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kang has saved 54% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Brumm has saved 49.44% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kang has won 42.86% of matches played (W/L 6/ 8), with Brumm winning 34.04% (W/L 16/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kang has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 21/ 13), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 5). Brumm has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 87/ 76), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 29% (W/L 4/ 10).
- Player level: In the last year, Kang has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 6/ 4), where as Brumm has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 36.36% of matches (W/L 12/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Kang winning 2 times and Brumm being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Kang winning 4 and Brumm winning 1. The last match between Kang and Brumm was at the M15 Rancho Santa Fe, 01-06-2022, First, Hard with Kyle Kang getting the victory 6-4 0-6 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:6:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kang and Brumm have played a deciding set 1 times, with Kang winning 1 times and Brumm 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kang winning 0, and Brumm 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kang has played against opponents with an average rank of 275.57 while Brumm has played against players with an average rank of 244.79.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kang has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Brumm has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kang has converted 42.31% of breakpoint opportunities, and Brumm has converted 42.25% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
900
Rank
591
High
19
Age
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
738
Rank
691
High
25
Age
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
52% (44-41)
Career Total W/L
51% (110-106)
43% (3-4)
YTD W/L
29% (7-17)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Kyle Kang vs Jacob Brumm For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Kang VS Brumm
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Kyle Kang | Jacob Brumm |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 25 | 19 |
| Aces (Total) | 11 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 14 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:6:0 | 2:6:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (81/147) | 52% (83/160) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (54/81) | 59% (49/83) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (31/66) | 38% (29/77) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 36% (10/28) | 78% (7/9) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (82/160) | 42% (62/147) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 0-6 6-2 |
Stats 
Kyle Kang
Player
Jacob Brumm
58%
(
50 of
86)
1st Serve %
56%
(
52 of
93)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
43%
(
37 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
91
Total Points Won
88
|
||||
| 7-5 6-2 |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Jacob Brumm
51%
(
31 of
61)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
67)
8
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
11
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Kyle Kang | Jacob Brumm |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 43% (3/4) | 29% (7/17) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 47% (8/9) | 32% (17/36) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (76/81) | 43% (204/268) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 43% (3/4) | 40% (4/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 23% (3/10) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.17 | 0.25 |
| Aces Total | 13 | 57 |
| DFs per game | 0.18 | 0.31 |
| DFs Total | 14 | 73 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:51:47 | 1:45:12 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 274.71 | 246.92 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (294/499) | 56% (843/1493) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (198/294) | 62% (523/843) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (98/205) | 48% (309/650) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (22/52) | 42% (60/142) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (206/520) | 40% (607/1534) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/2) | 25% (3/9) |
| Futures W/L | 60% (3/2) | 33% (4/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 43% (3/7) | 29% (7/24) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 67% (2/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (1/3) | 40% (2/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (3/2) | 78% (9/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (3/1) | 22% (9/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (4/1) | 0% (15/0) |
Kyle Kang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Alafia Ayeni
Player
Kyle Kang
63%
(
78 of
124)
1st Serve %
58%
(
62 of
106)
7
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
2
74%
(
58 of
78)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
43%
(
20 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
46 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
106)
121
Total Points Won
109
|
6-1 6-7(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Jeremy Jin
56%
(
41 of
73)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
84)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
4
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
82
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Kyle Kang
70%
(
62 of
88)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
74)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
47%
(
41 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
79
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Ethan Quinn
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Axel Nefve
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matias Soto
Player
Kyle Kang
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
71%
(
48 of
68)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Noah Rubin
Player
Kyle Kang
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Kyle Kang
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
3
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
August Holmgren
Player
Kyle Kang
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
12
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Karue Sell
60%
(
52 of
86)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
99)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
99)
100
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Jacob Brumm Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Collin Altamirano
Player
Jacob Brumm
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
27 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
79)
83
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Brumm
Player
Ryan Dickerson
62%
(
56 of
91)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
87)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
43%
(
39 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
87)
91
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Collin Altamirano
Player
Jacob Brumm
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Brumm
Player
Zhengqing Ji
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
3
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
1
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alex Knaff
Player
Jacob Brumm
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jacob Brumm
Player
Spencer Johnson
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Brumm
Player
Semen Pankin
51%
(
38 of
74)
1st Serve %
69%
(
52 of
75)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
83
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bernard Tomic
Player
Jacob Brumm
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
88)
8
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
5
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Igor Gimenez
Player
Jacob Brumm
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
51%
(
29 of
57)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jose Pereira
Player
Jacob Brumm
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
26 of
49)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Kang Vs Brumm Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Kang are available here and Brumm photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
